Matching a modified vee Lund 1625 Classic SS 2007 against a deep vee Lund WC 14 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1625 Classic SS 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Lund WC 14 2013 at 14,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1625 Classic SS 2007 tips the scales at 665 lbs — 370 lbs more than the Lund WC 14 2013 at 295 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Lund 1625 Classic SS 2007 and 25 hp for the Lund WC 14 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund WC 14 2013 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 17 lbs per hp for the Lund 1625 Classic SS 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.