Matching a deep vee Lund 1600 Fury Tiller 2013 against a modified vee Lund 1750 Outfitter Tiller 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Fury Tiller 2013 at 16,2 ft versus Lund 1750 Outfitter Tiller 2011 at 17,6 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1750 Outfitter Tiller 2011 tips the scales at 805 lbs — 240 lbs less than the Lund 1600 Fury Tiller 2013 at 565 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Lund 1600 Fury Tiller 2013 and 60 hp for the Lund 1750 Outfitter Tiller 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1750 Outfitter Tiller 2011 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Fury Tiller 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lund 1750 Outfitter Tiller 2011 and its 60-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lund 1600 Fury Tiller 2013 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.