Matching a deep vee Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 against a modified vee Lund WC 16 DLX 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 at 16,2 ft versus Lund WC 16 DLX 2010 at 16,2 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 tips the scales at 565 lbs — 140 lbs more than the Lund WC 16 DLX 2010 at 425 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 and 30 hp for the Lund WC 16 DLX 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund WC 16 DLX 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 comes in at 14 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lund WC 16 DLX 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1600 Fury SS 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,2 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund WC 16 DLX 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.