The Lund 1600 Fury SS 2012 vs Lund U1756VF 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Fury SS 2012 at 16,2 ft versus Lund U1756VF 2006 at 17,0 ft. At 565 lbs and 545 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 40 hp for the Lund 1600 Fury SS 2012 and 55 hp for the Lund U1756VF 2006. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund U1756VF 2006 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1600 Fury SS 2012 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund U1756VF 2006 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund U1756VF 2006 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Fury SS 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lund U1756VF 2006 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 17,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1600 Fury SS 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.