When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1600 Alaskan 2005 and the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2007 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 1600 Alaskan 2005 measures 16,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 14,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2007 at 2,0 feet (2007). At 85 lbs and 16 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 225 hp, the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2007 has a 150-hp advantage over the Lund 1600 Alaskan 2005's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1600 Alaskan 2005 carries 19 gallons versus 5 gallons in the Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2007. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 2000 Sport Angler 2007 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.