Matching a deep vee Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2013 against a modified vee Lund 1700 Pro Sport OB 2005 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2013 at 16,8 ft versus Lund 1700 Pro Sport OB 2005 at 16,0 ft. At 86 lbs and 12 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Lund 1700 Pro Sport OB 2005 has a 40-hp advantage over the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2013's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 1700 Pro Sport OB 2005 carries 24 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1700 Pro Sport OB 2005 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.