Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007
2007
View full specs →

Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 vs Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 and the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 at 16,8 ft versus Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 at 16,0 ft. At 86 lbs and 79 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 and 50 hp for the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 2 lbs per hp for the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,8 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1600 Alaskan Tiller
Model1625 Classic Sport
Model Year201
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam81 in
Beam76 in
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Meters1.93
Beam - Inches81
Beam - Inches76
Weight - Detail860 lbs
Weight - Detail790 lbs
Weight - kg390.09
Weight - kg358.34
Weight - lbs.86
Weight - lbs.79
Width [transom] - Detail69.5 in
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16.83
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.13
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches202
Length overall - Inches192
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury
Engine/s standardMercury
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max60 hp
Engine max50 hp
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft
Storagenot available
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r

Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 vs Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 or the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 is the longer of the two at 16,8 feet overall. The Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,8 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 or the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007?
For trailering, the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 has the edge at 79 lbs dry weight versus 86 lbs for the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 2 lbs per hp for the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 measures 81" wide, compared to 76" for the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 and Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1600 Alaskan Tiller 2010 and the Lund 1625 Classic Sport 2007 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.