Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1852MT 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1852MT 2010
2010
View full specs →

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 vs Lund 1852MT 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 and the Lund 1852MT 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 at 16,8 ft versus Lund 1852MT 2010 at 18,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 tips the scales at 915 lbs — 440 lbs more than the Lund 1852MT 2010 at 475 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 has a 30-hp advantage over the Lund 1852MT 2010's 45-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1852MT 2010 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1852MT 2010 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1852MT 2010 comes in at 11 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1852MT 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1600 Alaskan SS
Model1852MT
Model Year2011
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam81 in
Beam75 in
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches81
Beam - Inches75
Weight - Detail915 lbs
Weight - Detail475 lbs
Weight - kg415.04
Weight - kg215.46
Weight - lbs.915
Weight - lbs.475
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16.83
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters5.13
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches202
Length overall - Inches216
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches21
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail52 in
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness0.072 in
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max45 hp
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft
Storagenot available
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,375 lbs
Maximum peoplenot available
Maximum people6 / 815 lbs
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailShoreland'r
Trailer - Detailnot available

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 vs Lund 1852MT 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 or the Lund 1852MT 2010?
The Lund 1852MT 2010 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 comes in at 16,8 feet, making it roughly 1,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 or the Lund 1852MT 2010?
For trailering, the Lund 1852MT 2010 has the edge at 475 lbs dry weight versus 915 lbs for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1852MT 2010 tops out at 45 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1852MT 2010 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1852MT 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 11 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 measures 81" wide, compared to 75" for the Lund 1852MT 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 and Lund 1852MT 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2011 and the Lund 1852MT 2010 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.