Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010
2010
View full specs →

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 vs Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 and the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 at 16,8 ft versus Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 at 16,7 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 tips the scales at 915 lbs — 807 lbs more than the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 at 108 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 and 75 hp for the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 19 gal and 19 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 and Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1600 Alaskan SS
Model1675 Pro Guide Tiller
Model Year201
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam81 in
Beam90 in
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Meters2.29
Beam - Inches81
Beam - Inches9
Weight - Detail915 lbs
Weight - Detail1,080 lbs
Weight - kg415.04
Weight - kg489.88
Weight - lbs.915
Weight - lbs.108
Width [transom] - Detail69.5 in
Width [transom] - Detail76 in
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16.83
Length - Feet16.67
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 8 in
Length overall - Meters5.13
Length overall - Meters5.08
Length overall - Inches202
Length overall - Inches2
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max75 hp
Engine makenot available
Engine makeMercury
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft
StorageRod Storage: 6 ft. 6 in. - 7 ft
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 vs Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 or the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 is the longer of the two at 16,8 feet overall. The Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 comes in at 16,7 feet, making it roughly 0,2 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 or the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010?
For trailering, the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 has the edge at 108 lbs dry weight versus 915 lbs for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 measures 81" wide, compared to 9" for the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 and Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 19 gallons and 19 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 and Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2010 and the Lund 1675 Pro Guide Tiller 2010 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.