Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 boat specs
Lund
Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011
2011
View full specs →

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 vs Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 measures 20,5 feet overall (2011), giving it roughly 4,5 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 at 16,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 tips the scales at 915 lbs — 903 lbs more than the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 at 12 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 has a 50-hp advantage over the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 carries 27 gallons versus 19 gallons in the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 20,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1600 Alaskan SS
Model2000 Alaskan SS
Model Year2009
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam81 in
Beam90.5 in
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Meters2.31
Beam - Inches81
Beam - Inches90.5
Weight - Detail915 lbs
Weight - Detail1,200 lbs
Weight - kg415.04
Weight - kg544.31
Weight - lbs.915
Weight - lbs.12
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 / 25 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet20.5
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in
Length overall - Meters5.13
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Inches202
Length overall - Inches246
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury
Engine/s standardnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max125 hp
Operational Info
Storagenot available
StorageRod Storage: 8 - 8.5 ft
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailShoreland'r

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 vs Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 or the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 is the longer of the two at 20,5 feet overall. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 4,5 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 or the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011?
For trailering, the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 has the edge at 12 lbs dry weight versus 915 lbs for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 is rated to a maximum of 125 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 measures 91" wide, compared to 81" for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 or the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011?
The Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 has the bigger tank at 27 gallons, versus 19 gallons on the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. That 8-gallon difference translates to roughly 24–40 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and the Lund 2000 Alaskan SS 2011 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.