Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009
2009
View full specs →

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 vs Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and the Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 at 16,0 ft versus Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 at 17,0 ft. At 915 lbs and 895 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and 90 hp for the Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 19 gal and 19 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 are closely matched on the specs that matter most. Test-ride both on the water you actually use, check current dealer pricing, and factor in long-term service access before you sign.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1600 Alaskan SS
Model1710 Predator SS
Model Year2009
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam81 in
Beam84 in
Beam - Meters2.06
Beam - Meters2.13
Beam - Inches81
Beam - Inches84
Weight - Detail915 lbs
Weight - Detail895 lbs
Weight - kg415.04
Weight - kg405.96
Weight - lbs.915
Weight - lbs.895
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet17
Length - Inches1
Length - Inches1
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 10 in
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 1 in
Length overall - Meters5.13
Length overall - Meters5.21
Length overall - Inches202
Length overall - Inches205
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine/s standardMercury
Engine/s standardMercury
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp
Engine max90 hp
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailShoreland?r

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 vs Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 or the Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009?
The Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 or the Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009?
For trailering, the Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 has the edge at 895 lbs dry weight versus 915 lbs for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 measures 84" wide, compared to 81" for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 19 gallons and 19 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and the Lund 1710 Predator SS 2009 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.