Matching a modified vee Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 against a deep vee Lund 1625 Fury XL Sport 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 at 16,0 ft versus Lund 1625 Fury XL Sport 2013 at 16,3 ft. At 915 lbs and 902 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 and 60 hp for the Lund 1625 Fury XL Sport 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2009 comes in at 12 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Lund 1625 Fury XL Sport 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.