Matching a modified vee Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2006 against a deep vee Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2006 at 16,0 ft versus Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 at 16,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2006 tips the scales at 915 lbs — 907 lbs more than the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 at 8 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2006 and 90 hp for the Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 19 gal and 19 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1650 Rebel XL TLR 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.