Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 - Boat Spec Comparison

Q: Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 or the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013?

For trailering, the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 has the edge at 89 lbs dry weight versus 815 lbs for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Q: Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

Q: How many people can each boat hold?

The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Q: Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 measures 84" wide, compared to 79" for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

Q: How do the fuel tanks compare on the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 and Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013?

Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 19 gallons and 19 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.

Q: Are the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 and Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 and the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

Boat Comparison

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013

Lund

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004

2004

View full specs →

Lund

Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013

2013

View full specs →

Detailed Evaluation & Buyer Recommendation

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 and 90 hp for the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 19 gal and 19 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,5 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.

General Boat Info

MakeLund

Model1600 Alaskan SS

Model1650 Rebel XL Sport

Model Year2004

Model Year2013

Measurements / Dimensions

Beam79 in

Beam84 in

Beam - Meters2.01

Beam - Meters2.13

Beam - Inches79

Beam - Inches84

Weight - Detail815 lbs

Weight - Detail890 lbs

Weight - kg369.68

Weight - kg403.7

Weight - lbs.815

Weight - lbs.89

Height [transom]20 in

Length overall - Detail16 ft. 8 in

Length overall - Detail16 ft. 6 in

Length overall - Meters5.08

Length overall - Meters5.03

Length overall - Inches2

Length overall - Inches198

Depth - Detailnot available

Depth - Detail36.5 in. bow

Depth - Centimetersnot available

Depth - Centimeters93.98

Depth - Inchesnot available

Depth - Inches36.5

Length - Feetnot available

Length - Feet16.5

Body / Hull

Hull materialAluminum

Hull typenot available

Hull typeDeep Vee

Engine and Drivetrain

Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal. Built-in Tank

Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal

Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92

Fuel tank capacity - Gal19

Engine max75 hp

Engine max90 hp

Fuel typenot available

Fuel typeGas

Drive typenot available

Drive typeOutboard

Operational Info

Maximum people2

Maximum people6

Storagenot available

StorageRod Storage: 7 - 8 ft

Maximum capacitynot available

Maximum capacity1,350 lbs

Warranty Info

WarrantyLifetime Limited Warranty

Warrantynot available

Trailer Info

Trailer - Heightnot available

Trailer - Height6 ft. 3 in

Trailer - Length over allnot available

Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 1 in

Trailer - Weightnot available

Trailer - Weight1,775 lbs

Trailer - Widthnot available

Trailer - Width7 ft. 8 in

Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 vs Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 or the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013?

For trailering, the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 has the edge at 89 lbs dry weight versus 815 lbs for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.

Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?

The Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 is rated to a maximum of 90 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 tops out at 75 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.

How many people can each boat hold?

The Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.

Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?

The Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 measures 84" wide, compared to 79" for the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.

How do the fuel tanks compare on the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 and Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013?

Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 19 gallons and 19 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.

Are the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 and Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 from the same manufacturer?

Yes — both the Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 and the Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.

← Lund 1600 Alaskan SS 2004 full specs ← Lund 1650 Rebel XL Sport 2013 full specs