Matching a modified vee Lund 16 Rebel 2005 against a deep vee Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 16 Rebel 2005 at 16,0 ft versus Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 at 17,8 ft. At 52 lbs and 117 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 125 hp, the Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 has a 80-hp advantage over the Lund 16 Rebel 2005's 45-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lund 16 Rebel 2005. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lund 1775 Impact Sport 2013 and its 125-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lund 16 Rebel 2005 with its 45-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.