Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 boat specs
Lund
Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004
2004
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1852MT 2010 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1852MT 2010
2010
View full specs →

Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 vs Lund 1852MT 2010 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 vs Lund 1852MT 2010 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 45 hp for the Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 and 45 hp for the Lund 1852MT 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1852MT 2010 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1852MT 2010 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1852MT 2010 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model16 Rebel Tiller
Model1852MT
Model Year2004
Model Year201
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam73 in
Beam75 in
Beam - Meters1.85
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches73
Beam - Inches75
Weight - Detail455 lbs
Weight - Detail475 lbs
Weight - kg206.38
Weight - kg215.46
Weight - lbs.455
Weight - lbs.475
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length overall - Detail16 ft
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 0 in
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters5.49
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches216
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail21 in
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches21
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail52 in
Length - Feetnot available
Length - Feet18
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness0.072 in
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Engine max45 hp
Engine max45 hp
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum people2
Maximum people6 / 815 lbs
Maximum capacitynot available
Maximum capacity1,375 lbs
Warranty Info
WarrantyLifetime Limited Warranty
Warrantynot available

Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 vs Lund 1852MT 2010 — Common Questions

Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 or the Lund 1852MT 2010?
For trailering, the Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 has the edge at 455 lbs dry weight versus 475 lbs for the Lund 1852MT 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 is Coast Guard rated for 2 passengers, while the Lund 1852MT 2010 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1852MT 2010 measures 75" wide, compared to 73" for the Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 and Lund 1852MT 2010 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 16 Rebel Tiller 2004 and the Lund 1852MT 2010 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.