Matching a flat Lund 1448 2009 against a modified vee Lund 1625 Rebel XL Tiller 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lund 1448 2009 at 14,0 ft versus Lund 1625 Rebel XL Tiller 2010 at 16,3 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1625 Rebel XL Tiller 2010 tips the scales at 775 lbs — 410 lbs less than the Lund 1448 2009 at 365 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Lund 1625 Rebel XL Tiller 2010 has a 35-hp advantage over the Lund 1448 2009's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1625 Rebel XL Tiller 2010 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Lund 1448 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Lund 1625 Rebel XL Tiller 2010 at 16,3 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lund 1448 2009 at 14,0 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.