Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 boat specs
Lund
Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009
2009
View full specs →

Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 vs Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 — Which Modified Vee Fits Your Needs?

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 and the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 measures 18,0 feet overall (2009), giving it roughly 3,3 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 at 14,8 feet (2012). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 tips the scales at 975 lbs — 410 lbs less than the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 at 565 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 has a 45-hp advantage over the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012's 30-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 comes in at 13 lbs per hp versus 19 lbs per hp for the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 18,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLund
MakeLund
Model1400 Fury SS
Model1800 Alaskan Tiller
Model Year2012
Model Year2009
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam72 in
Beam83 in
Beam - Meters1.83
Beam - Meters2.11
Beam - Inches72
Beam - Inches83
Weight - Detail565 lbs
Weight - Detail975 lbs
Weight - kg256.28
Weight - kg442.25
Weight - lbs.565
Weight - lbs.975
Height [transom]20 in
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet14.75
Length - Feet18
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 9 in
Length overall - Meters4.5
Length overall - Meters5.72
Length overall - Inches177
Length overall - Inches225
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches9
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max30 hp
Engine max75 hp
Engine/s standardnot available
Engine/s standardMercury
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail19 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters71.92
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal19
Operational Info
StorageRod Storage: 7 ft
Storagenot available

Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 vs Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 or the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009?
The Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 is the longer of the two at 18,0 feet overall. The Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 comes in at 14,8 feet, making it roughly 3,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 or the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009?
For trailering, the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 has the edge at 565 lbs dry weight versus 975 lbs for the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 tops out at 30 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 13 lbs per hp compared to 19 lbs per hp for the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 measures 83" wide, compared to 72" for the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 and Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lund 1400 Fury SS 2012 and the Lund 1800 Alaskan Tiller 2009 are built by Lund. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.