Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Lowe SF214 2012 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe SF214 2012
2012
View full specs →

Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 vs Lowe SF214 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a flat Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 against a pontoon Lowe SF214 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe SF214 2012 measures 19,7 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 17,7 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 at 2,0 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe SF214 2012 tips the scales at 1 701 lbs — 704 lbs less than the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 at 997 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Lowe SF214 2012 has a 55-hp advantage over the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008's 60-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe SF214 2012 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe SF214 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe SF214 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 19,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelR2070VT Roughneck
ModelSF214
Model Year2008
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in. (2.43 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.5 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Depth - Detail25 in. (.63 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail997 lbs. (452 kg)
Weight - Detail1,701 lbs. (772 kg)
Weight - kg452.23
Weight - kg771.56
Weight - lbs.997
Weight - lbs.1701
Width [transom] - Detail70 in. (1.7 m)
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Height [transom]not available
Length - Meters6.24
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet2
Length - Feet19.67
Length - Inches6
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail20 ft. 6 in. (6.24 m)
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters6.25
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches246
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length [at waterline]not available
Length [at waterline]20 ft. 3 in. (6.17 m) pontoon log
Length [deck]not available
Length [deck]19 ft. 8 in. (5.99 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeFlat
Hull typePontoon
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxTiller: 60 hp (44 kW)
Engine max115 hp (86 kW)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal. (91 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,650 lbs. (748 kg)
Maximum capacity2,248 lbs. (1,020 kg)
Maximum people8 / 1,035 lbs. (469 kg)
Maximum people12 / 1,746 lbs. (792 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all23 in. (7.01 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameternot available
Tube diameter25 in . (0.64 m)
Tube gaugenot available
Tube gauge0.080 in. (2.03 mm)
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes2

Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 vs Lowe SF214 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 or the Lowe SF214 2012?
The Lowe SF214 2012 is the longer of the two at 19,7 feet overall. The Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 comes in at 2,0 feet, making it roughly 17,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 or the Lowe SF214 2012?
For trailering, the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 has the edge at 997 lbs dry weight versus 1 701 lbs for the Lowe SF214 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe SF214 2012 is rated to a maximum of 115 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 tops out at 60 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 8 passengers, while the Lowe SF214 2012 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe SF214 2012 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 and Lowe SF214 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe R2070VT Roughneck 2008 and the Lowe SF214 2012 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.