Lowe R1655SC 2009 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1655SC 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Lowe V1467WT 2012 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe V1467WT 2012
2012
View full specs →

Lowe R1655SC 2009 vs Lowe V1467WT 2012 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lowe R1655SC 2009 and the Lowe V1467WT 2012 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe R1655SC 2009 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe V1467WT 2012 at 13,9 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1655SC 2009 tips the scales at 752 lbs — 406 lbs more than the Lowe V1467WT 2012 at 346 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lowe R1655SC 2009 has a 50-hp advantage over the Lowe V1467WT 2012's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1655SC 2009 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lowe V1467WT 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: The Lowe R1655SC 2009 at 16,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lowe V1467WT 2012 at 13,9 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelR1655SC
ModelV1467WT
Model Year2009
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam79 in. (2.01 m)
Beam67 in. (1.7 m)
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Inches79
Beam - Inches67
Depth - Detail25 in. (0.64 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail752 lbs. (341 kg)
Weight - Detail346 lbs. (157 kg)
Weight - kg341.1
Weight - kg156.94
Weight - lbs.752
Weight - lbs.346
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (0.5 m)
Length - Meters5
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet13.92
Length - Inches5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 5 in. (5 m)
Length overall - Detail13 ft. 11 in. (4.24 m)
Length overall - Meters5
Length overall - Meters4.24
Length overall - Inches197
Length overall - Inches167
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail27 in. (0.69 m)
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches27
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness0.072 in. (1.8 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max75 hp (56 kw)
Engine max25 hp (19 kW) remote or tiller
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,360 lbs. (617 kg)
Maximum capacity1,058 lbs. (480 kg)
Maximum people5 / 750 lbs. (340 kg)
Maximum people5 / 640 lbs. (290 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailPainted bunk trailer with swing tongue
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Lowe R1655SC 2009 vs Lowe V1467WT 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe R1655SC 2009 or the Lowe V1467WT 2012?
The Lowe R1655SC 2009 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Lowe V1467WT 2012 comes in at 13,9 feet, making it roughly 2,1 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe R1655SC 2009 or the Lowe V1467WT 2012?
For trailering, the Lowe V1467WT 2012 has the edge at 346 lbs dry weight versus 752 lbs for the Lowe R1655SC 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe R1655SC 2009 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe V1467WT 2012 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe R1655SC 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe V1467WT 2012 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe R1655SC 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 14 lbs per hp for the Lowe V1467WT 2012. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1655SC 2009 measures 79" wide, compared to 67" for the Lowe V1467WT 2012. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe R1655SC 2009 and Lowe V1467WT 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe R1655SC 2009 and the Lowe V1467WT 2012 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.