Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008
2008
View full specs →
VS
Lowe TR222S 2005 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe TR222S 2005
2005
View full specs →

Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 vs Lowe TR222S 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 vs Lowe TR222S 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe TR222S 2005 measures 22,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 7,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 at 15,0 feet (2008). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe TR222S 2005 tips the scales at 2 143 lbs — 2 087 lbs less than the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 at 56 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 80 hp for the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 and 100 hp for the Lowe TR222S 2005. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe TR222S 2005 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe TR222S 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe TR222S 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelR1655N Roughneck
ModelTR222S
Model Year2008
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam75 in. (1.9 m)
Beam8 ft. 0 in. (2.43 m)
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Inches75
Beam - Inches96
Depth - Detail22.5 in. (.57 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches22.5
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail560 lbs. (254 kg)
Weight - DetailStandard: 1,787 lbs. (810 kg) XL Option: 2,143 lbs. (972 kg)
Weight - kg254.01
Weight - kg972.05
Weight - lbs.56
Weight - lbs.2143
Width [transom] - Detail55 in. (1.39 m)
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Height [transom]not available
Length - Meters4.82
Length - Meters6.7
Length - Feet15
Length - Feet22
Length - Inches1
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in. (4.82 m)
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 0 in. (6.7 m)
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Inches19
Length overall - Inches264
Length [deck]not available
Length [deck]21 ft. 8 in. (6.6 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max80 hp (60 kW)
Engine maxStandard: 100 hp (74 kw) XL Option: 135 hp (100 kw)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal. (90.8 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,352 lbs. (613 kg)
Maximum capacityStandard: 2,152 lbs. (976 kg) XL Option: 2,613 lbs. (1,185 kg)
Maximum people6 / 750 lbs. (340 kg)
Maximum peopleStandard: 12 XL Option: 14
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m)
Trailer - Length over all28 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Width8 ft. 0 in
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameternot available
Tube diameter23 in. (.58 m)
Tube gaugenot available
Tube gauge.080 in

Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 vs Lowe TR222S 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 or the Lowe TR222S 2005?
The Lowe TR222S 2005 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 7,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 or the Lowe TR222S 2005?
For trailering, the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 has the edge at 56 lbs dry weight versus 2 143 lbs for the Lowe TR222S 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe TR222S 2005 is rated to a maximum of 100 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 tops out at 80 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lowe TR222S 2005 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe TR222S 2005 measures 96" wide, compared to 75" for the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 and Lowe TR222S 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe R1655N Roughneck 2008 and the Lowe TR222S 2005 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.