Lowe R1655CC 2011 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1655CC 2011
2011
View full specs →
VS
Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006
2006
View full specs →

Lowe R1655CC 2011 vs Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe R1655CC 2011 vs Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe R1655CC 2011 at 16,4 ft versus Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1655CC 2011 tips the scales at 769 lbs — 404 lbs more than the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 at 365 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lowe R1655CC 2011 has a 45-hp advantage over the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006's 30-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1655CC 2011 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lowe R1655CC 2011 and its 75-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 with its 30-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelR1655CC
ModelSea Nymph 1667T
Model Year2011
Model Year2006
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam79 in. (2.01 m)
Beam67 in. (1.70 m)
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Inches79
Beam - Inches67
Depth - Detail25 in. (0.64 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail769 lbs. (348 kg)
Weight - Detail365 lbs. (165 kg)
Weight - kg348.81
Weight - kg165.56
Weight - lbs.769
Weight - lbs.365
Width [transom] - Detail55 in. (1.40 m) bottom
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]15 in. (.38 m) or 20 in. (.50 m)
Length - Feet16.42
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 5 in. (5 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in. (4.87 m)
Length overall - Meters5
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches197
Length overall - Inches192
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail27 in. (.69 m)
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches27
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters4.87
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness.072 in. (.183 cm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp (56 kW)
Engine max30 hp (22 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,360 lbs. (617 kg)
Maximum capacity1,153 lbs. (523 kg)
Maximum people5 / 750 lbs. (340 kg)
Maximum people5
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailPainted bunk trailer with swing tongue
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Lowe R1655CC 2011 vs Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe R1655CC 2011 or the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006?
The Lowe R1655CC 2011 is the longer of the two at 16,4 feet overall. The Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe R1655CC 2011 or the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006?
For trailering, the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 has the edge at 365 lbs dry weight versus 769 lbs for the Lowe R1655CC 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe R1655CC 2011 is rated to a maximum of 75 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 tops out at 30 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe R1655CC 2011 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe R1655CC 2011 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 10 lbs per hp compared to 12 lbs per hp for the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1655CC 2011 measures 79" wide, compared to 67" for the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe R1655CC 2011 and Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe R1655CC 2011 and the Lowe Sea Nymph 1667T 2006 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.