Lowe R1655 2010 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1655 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005
2005
View full specs →

Lowe R1655 2010 vs Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe R1655 2010 vs Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe R1655 2010 at 16,4 ft versus Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1655 2010 tips the scales at 658 lbs — 599 lbs more than the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 at 59 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 50 hp for the Lowe R1655 2010 and 70 hp for the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1655 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 and its 70-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lowe R1655 2010 with its 50-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelR1655
ModelSea Nymph 1677CC
Model Year201
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam79 in. (2.01 m)
Beam77 in. (2.03 m)
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Meters1.96
Beam - Inches79
Beam - Inches77
Depth - Detail25 in. (0.64 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail658 lbs. (298 kg)
Weight - Detail590 lbs. (267 kg)
Weight - kg298.46
Weight - kg267.62
Weight - lbs.658
Weight - lbs.59
Width [transom] - DetailBottom Width: 55 in. (1.40 m)
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.50 m)
Length - Feet16.42
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 5 in. (5 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 5 in. (5.0 m)
Length overall - Meters5
Length overall - Meters5
Length overall - Inches197
Length overall - Inches197
Height - Detailnot available
Height - DetailBow: 31 in. (.79 m)
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.79
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches31
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters5
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches5
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness.072 in. (.183 cm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Engine max50 hp (37 kW)
Engine max70 hp (52 kw)
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,360 lbs. (617 kg)
Maximum capacity1,235 (560 kg)
Maximum people5 / 750 lbs. (340 kg)
Maximum people5
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m) (trailer optional)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Lowe R1655 2010 vs Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe R1655 2010 or the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005?
The Lowe R1655 2010 is the longer of the two at 16,4 feet overall. The Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 0,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe R1655 2010 or the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005?
For trailering, the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 has the edge at 59 lbs dry weight versus 658 lbs for the Lowe R1655 2010. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 is rated to a maximum of 70 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe R1655 2010 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe R1655 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 13 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1655 2010. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1655 2010 measures 79" wide, compared to 77" for the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe R1655 2010 and Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe R1655 2010 and the Lowe Sea Nymph 1677CC 2005 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.