The Lowe R1652VT 2006 vs Lowe V1467T 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe R1652VT 2006 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe V1467T 2012 at 13,9 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe V1467T 2012 tips the scales at 251 lbs — 209 lbs less than the Lowe R1652VT 2006 at 42 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Lowe R1652VT 2006 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe V1467T 2012's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1652VT 2006 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Lowe V1467T 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Lowe R1652VT 2006 at 16,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lowe V1467T 2012 at 13,9 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.