Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007
2007
View full specs →

Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 vs Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 vs Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 tips the scales at 605 lbs — 531 lbs more than the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 at 74 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 80 hp, the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 has a 40-hp advantage over the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007's 40-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 and its 80-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 with its 40-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelR1652SS Roughneck
ModelR1756VPT Roughneck
Model Year2007
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam75 in. (1.9 m)
Beam77 in. (2.03 m)
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Meters1.96
Beam - Inches75
Beam - Inches77
Depth - Detail21 in. (.53 m)
Depth - Detail21 in. (.53 m)
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail605 lbs. (274 kg)
Weight - Detail740 lbs. (336 kg)
Weight - kg274.42
Weight - kg335.66
Weight - lbs.605
Weight - lbs.74
Width [transom] - Detail52 in. (1.32 m)
Width [transom] - Detail56 in. (1.42 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Length - Meters4.87
Length - Meters5.18
Length - Feet16
Length - Feet17
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in. (4.87 m)
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 0 in. (5.18 m)
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Inches192
Length overall - Inches204
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.100 in. (.25 cm)
Hull thickness.100 in. (.25 cm)
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max40 hp (30 kW)
Engine max80 hp (60 kW)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Detail13 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters49.21
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal13
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum capacity1,250 lbs. (567 kg)
Maximum people5
Maximum people5

Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 vs Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 or the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007?
The Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 comes in at 16,0 feet, making it roughly 1,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 or the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007?
For trailering, the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 has the edge at 74 lbs dry weight versus 605 lbs for the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 is rated to a maximum of 80 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 15 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 measures 77" wide, compared to 75" for the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 and Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 and the Lowe R1756VPT Roughneck 2007 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.