Lowe R1455SC 2009 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1455SC 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Lowe V1667WT 2013 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe V1667WT 2013
2013
View full specs →

Lowe R1455SC 2009 vs Lowe V1667WT 2013 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lowe R1455SC 2009 and the Lowe V1667WT 2013 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe R1455SC 2009 at 14,0 ft versus Lowe V1667WT 2013 at 16,0 ft. At 56 lbs and 44 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 50 hp for the Lowe R1455SC 2009 and 40 hp for the Lowe V1667WT 2013. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe V1667WT 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe R1455SC 2009 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe V1667WT 2013 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe V1667WT 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1455SC 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe V1667WT 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe R1455SC 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelR1455SC
ModelV1667WT
Model Year2009
Model Year2013
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam79 in. (2.01 m)
Beam67 in. (1.7 m)
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Meters1.7
Beam - Inches79
Beam - Inches67
Depth - Detail25 in. (0.64 m)
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Inches25
Depth - Inchesnot available
Weight - Detail560 lbs. (254 kg)
Weight - Detail440 lbs. (200 kg)
Weight - kg254.01
Weight - kg199.58
Weight - lbs.56
Weight - lbs.44
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (0.5 m)
Length - Meters4.45
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet14
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches7
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 7 in. (4.45 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. (4.88 m)
Length overall - Meters4.45
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches175
Length overall - Inches192
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Detail27 in. (0.69 m)
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Meters0.69
Height - Inchesnot available
Height - Inches27
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness0.072 in. (1.8 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max50 hp (37 kw)
Engine max40 hp (30 kW) remote
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum capacity1,153 lbs. (523 kg)
Maximum people4 / 599 lbs. (272 kg)
Maximum people5 / 735 lbs. (333 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailPainted bunk trailer with swing tongue
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. (5.79 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Lowe R1455SC 2009 vs Lowe V1667WT 2013 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe R1455SC 2009 or the Lowe V1667WT 2013?
The Lowe V1667WT 2013 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Lowe R1455SC 2009 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe R1455SC 2009 or the Lowe V1667WT 2013?
For trailering, the Lowe V1667WT 2013 has the edge at 44 lbs dry weight versus 56 lbs for the Lowe R1455SC 2009. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe R1455SC 2009 is rated to a maximum of 50 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe V1667WT 2013 tops out at 40 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe R1455SC 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Lowe V1667WT 2013 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe V1667WT 2013 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1455SC 2009. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1455SC 2009 measures 79" wide, compared to 67" for the Lowe V1667WT 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe R1455SC 2009 and Lowe V1667WT 2013 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe R1455SC 2009 and the Lowe V1667WT 2013 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.