Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Lowe R1455SC 2011 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1455SC 2011
2011
View full specs →

Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 vs Lowe R1455SC 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a pontoon Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 against a modified vee Lowe R1455SC 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 measures 22,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 7,4 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe R1455SC 2011 at 14,6 feet (2011). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 tips the scales at 2 839 lbs — 2 783 lbs more than the Lowe R1455SC 2011 at 56 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 has a 100-hp advantage over the Lowe R1455SC 2011's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 is rated for 11 passengers, while the Lowe R1455SC 2011 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 11 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe R1455SC 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelPlatinum 23 RFL
ModelR1455SC
Model Year2013
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam102 in. (2.5 m)
Beam79 in. (2.01 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.01
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches79
Weight - Detail2,839 lbs. (1,287 kg)
Weight - Detail560 lbs. (254 kg)
Weight - kg1287.75
Weight - kg254.01
Weight - lbs.2839
Weight - lbs.56
Length [at waterline]22 ft. (6.7 m) pontoon log
Length [at waterline]not available
Length [deck]22 ft. (6.7 m)
Length [deck]not available
Length - Feet22
Length - Feet14.58
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail25 in. (0.64 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches25
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail55 in. (1.40 m) bottom
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Detail14 ft. 7 in. (4.45 m)
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Meters4.45
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Inches175
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typePontoon
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.54 mm)
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter25 in. (0.64 m)
Tube diameternot available
Tube gauge0.080 in. (2.03 mm)
Tube gaugenot available
Number of tubes2
Number of tubesnot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail22 gal. (91 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters83.28
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal22
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp (112 kW)
Engine max50 hp (37 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity2,140 lbs. (970 kg)
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum people11 / 1,478 lbs. (670 kg)
Maximum people4 / 599 lbs. (272 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailPainted bunk trailer with swing tongue
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. (5.79 m)

Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 vs Lowe R1455SC 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 or the Lowe R1455SC 2011?
The Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Lowe R1455SC 2011 comes in at 14,6 feet, making it roughly 7,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 or the Lowe R1455SC 2011?
For trailering, the Lowe R1455SC 2011 has the edge at 56 lbs dry weight versus 2 839 lbs for the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe R1455SC 2011 tops out at 50 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 11 passengers, while the Lowe R1455SC 2011 is certified for 4. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 measures 102" wide, compared to 79" for the Lowe R1455SC 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 and Lowe R1455SC 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe Platinum 23 RFL 2013 and the Lowe R1455SC 2011 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.