Matching a flat Lowe L1852MT 2009 against a modified vee Lowe R1760 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe L1852MT 2009 at 18,0 ft versus Lowe R1760 2009 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1760 2009 tips the scales at 782 lbs — 307 lbs less than the Lowe L1852MT 2009 at 475 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 65 hp for the Lowe L1852MT 2009 and 60 hp for the Lowe R1760 2009. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1852MT 2009 comes in at 7 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1760 2009. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.