Matching a flat Lowe L1648M 2013 against a modified vee Lowe ST170 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe L1648M 2013 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe ST170 2011 at 17,4 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe ST170 2011 tips the scales at 995 lbs — 720 lbs less than the Lowe L1648M 2013 at 275 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lowe ST170 2011 has a 40-hp advantage over the Lowe L1648M 2013's 35-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 4 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1648M 2013 comes in at 8 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lowe ST170 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.