Lowe L1448M 2010 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe L1448M 2010
2010
View full specs →
VS
Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007
2007
View full specs →

Lowe L1448M 2010 vs Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe L1448M 2010 vs Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe L1448M 2010 at 14,0 ft versus Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 tips the scales at 545 lbs — 519 lbs less than the Lowe L1448M 2010 at 26 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 60 hp, the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 has a 35-hp advantage over the Lowe L1448M 2010's 25-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe L1448M 2010 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1448M 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe L1448M 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 4 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelL1448M
ModelR1652VT Roughneck
Model Year201
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam70 in. (1.77 m)
Beam75 in. (1.9 m)
Beam - Meters1.78
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches7
Beam - Inches75
Depth - Detail21 in. (0.53 m)
Depth - Detail21 in. (.53 m)
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches21
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail260 lbs. (118 kg)
Weight - Detail545 lbs. (247 kg)
Weight - kg117.93
Weight - kg247.21
Weight - lbs.26
Weight - lbs.545
Width [transom] - DetailBottom Width: 48 in. (1.2 m)
Width [transom] - Detail52 in. (1.32 m)
Height [transom]15 in. (0.38 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Length - Feet14
Length - Feet16
Length overall - Detail14 ft. (4.27 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in. (4.87 m)
Length overall - Meters4.27
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches168
Length overall - Inches192
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters4.87
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.072 in. (1.83 mm)
Hull thickness.100 in. (.25 cm)
Hull typeFlat
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max25 hp (19 kW)
Engine maxRemote: 60 hp (45 kW) Tiller: 35 hp (26 kW)
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity825 lbs. (374 kg)
Maximum capacity1,145 lbs. (519 kg)
Maximum people4 / 500 lbs. (227 kg)
Maximum people5
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. (5.79 m) (trailer optional)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Lowe L1448M 2010 vs Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe L1448M 2010 or the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007?
The Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Lowe L1448M 2010 comes in at 14,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe L1448M 2010 or the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007?
For trailering, the Lowe L1448M 2010 has the edge at 26 lbs dry weight versus 545 lbs for the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 is rated to a maximum of 60 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe L1448M 2010 tops out at 25 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe L1448M 2010 is Coast Guard rated for 4 passengers, while the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe L1448M 2010 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 9 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 measures 75" wide, compared to 7" for the Lowe L1448M 2010. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe L1448M 2010 and Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe L1448M 2010 and the Lowe R1652VT Roughneck 2007 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.