Matching a flat Lowe L1436 2012 against a modified vee Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe L1436 2012 at 13,8 ft versus Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 at 15,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe L1436 2012 tips the scales at 185 lbs — 129 lbs more than the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 at 56 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 80 hp, the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 has a 60-hp advantage over the Lowe L1436 2012's 20-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lowe L1436 2012 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 9 lbs per hp for the Lowe L1436 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 15,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe L1436 2012 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.