Lowe L1236 2009 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe L1236 2009
2009
View full specs →
VS
Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007
2007
View full specs →

Lowe L1236 2009 vs Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe L1236 2009 vs Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 measures 16,0 feet overall (2007), giving it roughly 5,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe L1236 2009 at 11,0 feet (2009). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 tips the scales at 605 lbs — 591 lbs less than the Lowe L1236 2009 at 14 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 40 hp, the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 has a 30-hp advantage over the Lowe L1236 2009's 10-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe L1236 2009 caps at 3. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1236 2009 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 15 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe L1236 2009 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 3 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelL1236
ModelR1652SS Roughneck
Model Year2009
Model Year2007
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam56 in. (1.42 m)
Beam75 in. (1.9 m)
Beam - Meters1.42
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches56
Beam - Inches75
Depth - Detail17 in. (0.43 m)
Depth - Detail21 in. (.53 m)
Depth - Centimeters43.18
Depth - Centimeters53.34
Depth - Inches17
Depth - Inches21
Weight - Detail140 lbs. (63 kg)
Weight - Detail605 lbs. (274 kg)
Weight - kg63.5
Weight - kg274.42
Weight - lbs.14
Weight - lbs.605
Height [transom]15 in. (0.38 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Length - Meters3.63
Length - Meters4.87
Length - Feet11
Length - Feet16
Length - Inches11
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail11 ft. 11 in. (3.63 m)
Length overall - Detail16 ft. 0 in. (4.87 m)
Length overall - Meters3.63
Length overall - Meters4.88
Length overall - Inches143
Length overall - Inches192
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail52 in. (1.32 m)
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.050 in. (1.27 mm)
Hull thickness.100 in. (.25 cm)
Hull typeFlat
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Engine max10 hp (7.5 kw)
Engine max40 hp (30 kW)
Drive typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Operational Info
Maximum capacity527 lbs. (239 kg)
Maximum capacity1,100 lbs. (499 kg)
Maximum people3 / 325 lbs. (147 kg)
Maximum people5
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all18 ft. (5.49 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available

Lowe L1236 2009 vs Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe L1236 2009 or the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007?
The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 is the longer of the two at 16,0 feet overall. The Lowe L1236 2009 comes in at 11,0 feet, making it roughly 5,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe L1236 2009 or the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007?
For trailering, the Lowe L1236 2009 has the edge at 14 lbs dry weight versus 605 lbs for the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 is rated to a maximum of 40 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe L1236 2009 tops out at 10 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe L1236 2009 is Coast Guard rated for 3 passengers, while the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 is certified for 5. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe L1236 2009 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 15 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 measures 75" wide, compared to 56" for the Lowe L1236 2009. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe L1236 2009 and Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe L1236 2009 and the Lowe R1652SS Roughneck 2007 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.