Lowe JM220 2005 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe JM220 2005
2005
View full specs →
VS
Lowe R2065CC 2011 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R2065CC 2011
2011
View full specs →

Lowe JM220 2005 vs Lowe R2065CC 2011 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe JM220 2005 vs Lowe R2065CC 2011 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe JM220 2005 at 22,0 ft versus Lowe R2065CC 2011 at 19,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R2065CC 2011 tips the scales at 1 112 lbs — 920 lbs less than the Lowe JM220 2005 at 192 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 115 hp for the Lowe JM220 2005 and 115 hp for the Lowe R2065CC 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe JM220 2005 carries 31 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Lowe R2065CC 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe JM220 2005 is rated for 13 passengers, while the Lowe R2065CC 2011 caps at 8. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe JM220 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe JM220 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 13 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe R2065CC 2011 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 8 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelJM22
ModelR2065CC
Model Year2005
Model Year2011
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.45 m)
Beam88 in. (2.24 m)
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Meters2.24
Beam - Inches102
Beam - Inches88
Weight - DetailStandard: 1,700 lbs. (771 kg) XL Option: 1,920 lbs. (870.9 kg)
Weight - Detail1,112 lbs. (504 kg)
Weight - kg870.9
Weight - kg504.39
Weight - lbs.192
Weight - lbs.1112
Length [deck]22 ft. 0 in. (6.7 m)
Length [deck]not available
Length - Meters6.7
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet22
Length - Feet19.75
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 0 in. (6.7 m)
Length overall - Detail19 ft. 9 in. (6.02 m)
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Meters6.02
Length overall - Inches264
Length overall - Inches237
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail25 in. (0.64 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters63.5
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches25
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Width [transom] - Detail65 in. (1.65 m) bottom
Height [transom]not available
Height [transom]20 in. (0.51 m)
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameter25 in. (.63 m)
Tube diameternot available
Tube gauge.080 in
Tube gaugenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail31 gal. (117 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail20 gal
Fuel tank capacity - Liters117.35
Fuel tank capacity - Liters75.71
Fuel tank capacity - Gal31
Fuel tank capacity - Gal2
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine maxStandard: 115 hp (85 kw) XL Option: 135 hp (100 kw)
Engine max115 hp (86 kW)
Fuel typenot available
Fuel typeGas
Operational Info
Maximum capacityStandard: 2,463 lbs. (1,117 kg) XL Option: 2,763 lbs. (1,253 kg)
Maximum capacity1,898 lbs. (861 kg)
Maximum peopleStandard: 13 XL Option: 15
Maximum people8 / 1,258 lbs. (571 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over all30 ft. 0 in
Trailer - Length over all21 ft. 2 in. (6.45 m)
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailPainted bunk trailer with swing tongue
Body / Hull
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull thickness0.110 in. (2.8 mm)
Hull typenot available
Hull typeModified Vee

Lowe JM220 2005 vs Lowe R2065CC 2011 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe JM220 2005 or the Lowe R2065CC 2011?
The Lowe JM220 2005 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Lowe R2065CC 2011 comes in at 19,8 feet, making it roughly 2,3 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe JM220 2005 or the Lowe R2065CC 2011?
For trailering, the Lowe JM220 2005 has the edge at 192 lbs dry weight versus 1 112 lbs for the Lowe R2065CC 2011. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe JM220 2005 is Coast Guard rated for 13 passengers, while the Lowe R2065CC 2011 is certified for 8. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe JM220 2005 measures 102" wide, compared to 88" for the Lowe R2065CC 2011. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lowe JM220 2005 or the Lowe R2065CC 2011?
The Lowe JM220 2005 has the bigger tank at 31 gallons, versus 2 gallons on the Lowe R2065CC 2011. That 29-gallon difference translates to roughly 87–145 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lowe JM220 2005 and Lowe R2065CC 2011 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe JM220 2005 and the Lowe R2065CC 2011 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.