Matching a deep vee Lowe FS175 2013 against a modified vee Lowe R1760CC 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe FS175 2013 at 17,4 ft versus Lowe R1760CC 2011 at 17,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe FS175 2013 tips the scales at 1 446 lbs — 558 lbs more than the Lowe R1760CC 2011 at 888 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lowe FS175 2013 has a 75-hp advantage over the Lowe R1760CC 2011's 75-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe FS175 2013 carries 26 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Lowe R1760CC 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe FS175 2013 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1760CC 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.