Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007
2007
View full specs →
VS
Lowe SS210 2012 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe SS210 2012
2012
View full specs →

Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 vs Lowe SS210 2012 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 vs Lowe SS210 2012 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 at 17,0 ft versus Lowe SS210 2012 at 19,7 ft. At 115 lbs and 168 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 115 hp for the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 and 115 hp for the Lowe SS210 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 27 gal and 24 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe SS210 2012 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe SS210 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe SS210 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 19,7 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelFS175 Fish & Ski
ModelSS21
Model Year2007
Model Year2012
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam92 in. (2.33 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.5 m)
Beam - Meters2.34
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches92
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail1,150 lbs. (522 kg)
Weight - Detail1,680 lbs. (762 kg)
Weight - kg521.63
Weight - kg762.03
Weight - lbs.115
Weight - lbs.168
Width [transom] - Detail80 in. (2 m)
Width [transom] - Detailnot available
Height - Detail40 in. (1.01 m)
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters1.02
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches4
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Height [transom]not available
Length - Meters5.53
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet19.67
Length - Inches3
Length - Inchesnot available
Length overall - Detail17 ft. 3 in. (5.53 m)
Length overall - Detailnot available
Length overall - Meters5.26
Length overall - Metersnot available
Length overall - Inches207
Length overall - Inchesnot available
Length [at waterline]not available
Length [at waterline]20 ft. 3 in. (6.17 m) pontoon log
Length [deck]not available
Length [deck]19 ft. 8 in. (6 m)
Body / Hull
Hull thickness.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thicknessnot available
Hull materialnot available
Hull materialAluminum
Hull typenot available
Hull typePontoon
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail27 gal. (102 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail24 gal. (91 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters102.21
Fuel tank capacity - Liters90.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal27
Fuel tank capacity - Gal24
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max115 hp (86 kW)
Engine max115 hp (86 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,600 lbs. (725 kg)
Maximum capacity2,248 lbs. (1,020 kg)
Maximum people6
Maximum people12 / 1,746 lbs. (792 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - DetailLB-2600-82BL - painted bunk trailer w/ swing tongue (16.5 in.)
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - Length over allTongue in: 20 ft. 11 in. (6.4 m)
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Width102 in
Trailer - Widthnot available
Pontoon and Inflatable Specific
Tube diameternot available
Tube diameter25 in. (0.64 m)
Tube gaugenot available
Tube gauge0.080 in. (2.03 mm)
Number of tubesnot available
Number of tubes2

Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 vs Lowe SS210 2012 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 or the Lowe SS210 2012?
The Lowe SS210 2012 is the longer of the two at 19,7 feet overall. The Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 comes in at 17,0 feet, making it roughly 2,7 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 or the Lowe SS210 2012?
For trailering, the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 has the edge at 115 lbs dry weight versus 168 lbs for the Lowe SS210 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 is Coast Guard rated for 6 passengers, while the Lowe SS210 2012 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe SS210 2012 measures 102" wide, compared to 92" for the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Which boat has the larger fuel tank — the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 or the Lowe SS210 2012?
The Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 has the bigger tank at 27 gallons, versus 24 gallons on the Lowe SS210 2012. That 3-gallon difference translates to roughly 9–15 nautical miles of additional range at cruising speed, depending on motor, load, and conditions.
Are the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 and Lowe SS210 2012 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe FS175 Fish & Ski 2007 and the Lowe SS210 2012 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.