The Lowe FS165 2013 vs Lowe R1756VT 2006 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe FS165 2013 at 16,4 ft versus Lowe R1756VT 2006 at 17,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1756VT 2006 tips the scales at 545 lbs — 420 lbs less than the Lowe FS165 2013 at 125 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Lowe FS165 2013 and 80 hp for the Lowe R1756VT 2006. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe FS165 2013 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lowe R1756VT 2006 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe FS165 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe FS165 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 7 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1756VT 2006. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lowe FS165 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 16,4 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe R1756VT 2006 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.