Matching a modified vee Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 against a flat Lowe L1652MT 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 at 18,0 ft versus Lowe L1652MT 2012 at 15,8 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 tips the scales at 625 lbs — 580 lbs more than the Lowe L1652MT 2012 at 45 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 60 hp for the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 and 50 hp for the Lowe L1652MT 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1652MT 2012 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 10 lbs per hp for the Lowe Frontier 1860 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: The Lowe Frontier 1860 2011 at 18,0 ft is the right call if deck space, comfort, and entertaining are top of your list. The Lowe L1652MT 2012 at 15,8 ft wins on trailering ease, likely lower purchase price, and simpler docking — a solid choice for a buyer who wants more boat for less money.