Matching a tunnel Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 against a modified vee Lowe R1860SC 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 at 18,0 ft versus Lowe R1860SC 2011 at 18,4 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1860SC 2011 tips the scales at 956 lbs — 861 lbs less than the Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 at 95 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 and 90 hp for the Lowe R1860SC 2011. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe Frontier 1860 Tunnel Jet 2013 carries 19 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Lowe R1860SC 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 7 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.