Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008
2008
View full specs →

Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 vs Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 — A Close Look at Two Modified Vees

When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 and the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 at 17,0 ft versus Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 at 15,0 ft. At 73 lbs and 56 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 and 80 hp for the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 6 passengers and at 15,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelFrontier 1756 SC
ModelR1655D Roughneck
Model Year2013
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam80 in. (2.03 m)
Beam75 in. (1.9 m)
Beam - Meters2.03
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches8
Beam - Inches75
Depth - Detail23 in. (0.58 m)
Depth - Detail22.5 in. (.57 m)
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Inches23
Depth - Inches22.5
Weight - Detail730 lbs. (331 kg)
Weight - Detail560 lbs. (254 kg)
Weight - kg331.12
Weight - kg254.01
Weight - lbs.73
Weight - lbs.56
Width [transom] - Detail56 in. (1.42 m) bottom
Width [transom] - Detail55 in. (1.52 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (0.5 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Length - Feet17
Length - Feet15
Length overall - Detail17 ft. (5.18 m)
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in. (4.82 m)
Length overall - Meters5.18
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Inches204
Length overall - Inches19
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters4.82
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.54 mm)
Hull thickness.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull typeModified Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max75 hp (56 kW)
Engine max80 hp (60 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,260 lbs. (572 kg)
Maximum capacity1,352 lbs. (613 kg)
Maximum people5 / 700 lbs. (318 kg)
Maximum people6 / 750 lbs. (340 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m)

Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 vs Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 or the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008?
The Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 is the longer of the two at 17,0 feet overall. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 2,0 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 or the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008?
For trailering, the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 has the edge at 56 lbs dry weight versus 73 lbs for the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat has the better power-to-weight ratio?
The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 has a better power-to-weight ratio at 1 lbs per hp compared to 1 lbs per hp for the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013. A lower number means quicker acceleration and faster time to plane — the number that actually matters most on short, sporty boats like these.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 measures 75" wide, compared to 8" for the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 and Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 and the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.