When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 and the Lowe R1655 2010 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 at 17,0 ft versus Lowe R1655 2010 at 16,4 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1655 2010 tips the scales at 658 lbs — 585 lbs less than the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 at 73 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe R1655 2010's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 13 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1655 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.