Matching a modified vee Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 against a pontoon Lowe GS202 2012 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 at 17,0 ft versus Lowe GS202 2012 at 17,9 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe GS202 2012 tips the scales at 1 508 lbs — 1 435 lbs less than the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 at 73 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 75 hp for the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 and 60 hp for the Lowe GS202 2012. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe GS202 2012 is rated for 9 passengers, while the Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 caps at 5. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe GS202 2012 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 25 lbs per hp for the Lowe GS202 2012. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lowe GS202 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 9 passengers and at 17,9 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe Frontier 1756 SC 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 5 that costs less to run day-to-day.