Matching a modified vee Lowe Frontier 1650 DLX 2013 against a deep vee Lowe FS165 2009 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe Frontier 1650 DLX 2013 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe FS165 2009 at 16,0 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe Frontier 1650 DLX 2013 tips the scales at 565 lbs — 564 lbs more than the Lowe FS165 2009 at 1 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 90 hp, the Lowe FS165 2009 has a 40-hp advantage over the Lowe Frontier 1650 DLX 2013's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe FS165 2009 carries 27 gallons versus 6 gallons in the Lowe Frontier 1650 DLX 2013. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe FS165 2009 is rated for 6 passengers, while the Lowe Frontier 1650 DLX 2013 caps at 4. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe FS165 2009 could be the deciding factor.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe FS165 2009 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Lowe Frontier 1650 DLX 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.