Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013
2013
View full specs →
VS
Lowe TH222 2005 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe TH222 2005
2005
View full specs →

Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 vs Lowe TH222 2005 — Same Brand, Different Boat

The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 vs Lowe TH222 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe TH222 2005 measures 22,0 feet overall (2005), giving it roughly 3,6 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 at 18,4 feet (2013). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe TH222 2005 tips the scales at 218 lbs — 201 lbs less than the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 at 17 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 175 hp, the Lowe TH222 2005 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013's 150-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Both carry nearly identical fuel loads — 38 gal and 38 gal — so range won't be a tiebreaker here.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe TH222 2005 is rated for 12 passengers, while the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 caps at 7. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe TH222 2005 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe TH222 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 12 passengers and at 22,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 7 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelFM185 Pro WT
ModelTH222
Model Year2013
Model Year2005
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam96 in. (2.44 m)
Beam8 ft. 6 in. (2.61 m)
Beam - Meters2.44
Beam - Meters2.59
Beam - Inches96
Beam - Inches102
Weight - Detail1,700 lbs. (771.1 kg)
Weight - Detail2,180 lbs. (988.8 kg)
Weight - kg771.11
Weight - kg988.83
Weight - lbs.17
Weight - lbs.218
Width [transom] - Detail83 in. (2.11 m) bottom
Width [transom] - Detail7 ft. 1 in. (2.15 m)
Height - Detail41 in. (1.04 m) bow
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters1.04
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches41
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]25 in. (0.64 m)
Height [transom]20 in
Length - Feet18.42
Length - Feet22
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 5 in. (5.61 m)
Length overall - Detail22 ft. 0 in. (6.7 m)
Length overall - Meters5.61
Length overall - Meters6.71
Length overall - Inches221
Length overall - Inches264
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters6.7
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialnot available
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness.110 in
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typenot available
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail38 gal. (144 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detail38 gal. (143.8 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Liters143.85
Fuel tank capacity - Liters143.85
Fuel tank capacity - Gal38
Fuel tank capacity - Gal38
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typenot available
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp (111 kW) 9.9 hp (7.4 kW) Kicker motor
Engine max175 hp (129.5 kw)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,759 lbs. (798 kg)
Maximum capacity2,315 lbs. (1,050 kg)
Maximum people7 / 1,115 lbs. (506 kg)
Maximum people12
Storagenot available
Storage68 cu. ft
Trailer Info
Trailer - Width102 in. (2.59 m)
Trailer - Width8 ft. 6 in
Trailer - Detailnot available
Trailer - DetailB2138TB - painted tandem bunk trailer w/brakes
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all26 ft. 0 in

Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 vs Lowe TH222 2005 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 or the Lowe TH222 2005?
The Lowe TH222 2005 is the longer of the two at 22,0 feet overall. The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 comes in at 18,4 feet, making it roughly 3,6 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 or the Lowe TH222 2005?
For trailering, the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 has the edge at 17 lbs dry weight versus 218 lbs for the Lowe TH222 2005. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe TH222 2005 is rated to a maximum of 175 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 tops out at 150 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Lowe TH222 2005 is certified for 12. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe TH222 2005 measures 102" wide, compared to 96" for the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
How do the fuel tanks compare on the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 and Lowe TH222 2005?
Both boats carry similar fuel loads — 38 gallons and 38 gallons respectively. Range will depend heavily on motor choice, throttle usage, and whether you're on flat lake water or coastal chop.
Are the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 and Lowe TH222 2005 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2013 and the Lowe TH222 2005 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.