Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012
2012
View full specs →
VS
Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 boat specs
Lowe
Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008
2008
View full specs →

Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 vs Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 — Same Brand, Different Boat

Matching a deep vee Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 against a modified vee Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 measures 18,4 feet overall (2012), giving it roughly 3,4 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 at 15,0 feet (2008). At 121 lbs and 56 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 150 hp, the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 has a 70-hp advantage over the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 could be the deciding factor.

Bottom line: Choose the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 7 passengers and at 18,4 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.
General Boat Info
MakeLowe
MakeLowe
ModelFM185 Pro WT
ModelR1655D Roughneck
Model Year2012
Model Year2008
Measurements / Dimensions
Beam95 in. (2.41 m)
Beam75 in. (1.9 m)
Beam - Meters2.41
Beam - Meters1.91
Beam - Inches95
Beam - Inches75
Weight - Detail1,210 lbs. (549 kg)
Weight - Detail560 lbs. (254 kg)
Weight - kg548.85
Weight - kg254.01
Weight - lbs.121
Weight - lbs.56
Width [transom] - Detail83 in. (2.11 m) bottom
Width [transom] - Detail55 in. (1.52 m)
Height - Detail41 in. (1.04 m) bow
Height - Detailnot available
Height - Meters1.04
Height - Metersnot available
Height - Inches41
Height - Inchesnot available
Height [transom]25 in. (0.64 m)
Height [transom]20 in. (.5 m)
Length - Feet18.42
Length - Feet15
Length overall - Detail18 ft. 5 in. (5.61 m)
Length overall - Detail15 ft. 10 in. (4.82 m)
Length overall - Meters5.61
Length overall - Meters4.83
Length overall - Inches221
Length overall - Inches19
Depth - Detailnot available
Depth - Detail22.5 in. (.57 m)
Depth - Centimetersnot available
Depth - Centimeters58.42
Depth - Inchesnot available
Depth - Inches22.5
Length - Metersnot available
Length - Meters4.82
Length - Inchesnot available
Length - Inches1
Body / Hull
Hull materialAluminum
Hull materialAluminum
Hull thickness0.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull thickness.100 in. (2.5 mm)
Hull typeDeep Vee
Hull typeModified Vee
Engine and Drivetrain
Fuel tank capacity - Detail38 gal. (144 l)
Fuel tank capacity - Detailnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Liters143.85
Fuel tank capacity - Litersnot available
Fuel tank capacity - Gal38
Fuel tank capacity - Galnot available
Fuel typeGas
Fuel typeGas
Drive typeOutboard
Drive typeOutboard
Engine max150 hp (111 kW) 9.9 hp (7.4 kW) Kicker motor
Engine max80 hp (60 kW)
Operational Info
Maximum capacity1,759 lbs. (798 kg)
Maximum capacity1,352 lbs. (613 kg)
Maximum people7 / 1,115 lbs. (506 kg)
Maximum people6 / 750 lbs. (340 kg)
Trailer Info
Trailer - Width102 in. (2.59 m)
Trailer - Widthnot available
Trailer - Length over allnot available
Trailer - Length over all19 ft. 2 in. (5.84 m)

Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 vs Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 — Common Questions

Which is the larger boat — the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 or the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008?
The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 is the longer of the two at 18,4 feet overall. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 comes in at 15,0 feet, making it roughly 3,4 ft shorter — a meaningful difference in deck room and overall on-water presence.
Which is easier to trailer — the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 or the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008?
For trailering, the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 has the edge at 56 lbs dry weight versus 121 lbs for the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012. Add a motor (typically 300–500 lbs for an outboard in this class), gear, and a partial fuel load and the difference grows. Lighter is friendlier on smaller tow vehicles and on fuel economy while hauling.
Which boat can handle a bigger outboard?
The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 is rated to a maximum of 150 hp, giving it the larger power ceiling. The Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 tops out at 80 hp. Keep in mind that maximum ratings are just that — matching the motor to the actual load and usage pattern usually matters more than chasing the ceiling.
How many people can each boat hold?
The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 is Coast Guard rated for 7 passengers, while the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 is certified for 6. Note that legal capacity and comfortable capacity aren't always the same thing — on a full day out, most experienced boaters aim for about 80% of the rated number to keep things comfortable.
Which boat is wider, and does it affect trailering?
The Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 measures 95" wide, compared to 75" for the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008. The US standard-width towing limit is 8’6" (102") in most states — anything over that may need a wide-load permit. Confirm your specific route requirements with each state's DOT.
Are the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 and Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 from the same manufacturer?
Yes — both the Lowe FM185 Pro WT 2012 and the Lowe R1655D Roughneck 2008 are built by Lowe. That means shared dealer networks, common parts availability, and consistent build quality across the line. The choice between them is essentially a question of how much boat you need, not which brand you trust.