Matching a deep vee Lowe FM175 2010 against a tunnel Lowe R1760CJ 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe FM175 2010 at 17,3 ft versus Lowe R1760CJ 2011 at 17,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1760CJ 2011 tips the scales at 839 lbs — 726 lbs less than the Lowe FM175 2010 at 113 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Lowe FM175 2010 has a 35-hp advantage over the Lowe R1760CJ 2011's 80-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe FM175 2010 carries 27 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Lowe R1760CJ 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe FM175 2010 comes in at 1 lbs per hp versus 11 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1760CJ 2011. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.