Matching a deep vee Lowe FM175 Pro SC 2012 against a tunnel Lowe R1860CJ 2011 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe FM175 Pro SC 2012 at 17,4 ft versus Lowe R1860CJ 2011 at 18,4 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1860CJ 2011 tips the scales at 962 lbs — 849 lbs less than the Lowe FM175 Pro SC 2012 at 113 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Lowe FM175 Pro SC 2012 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe R1860CJ 2011's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe FM175 Pro SC 2012 carries 27 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Lowe R1860CJ 2011. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe R1860CJ 2011 is rated for 7 passengers, while the Lowe FM175 Pro SC 2012 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe R1860CJ 2011 could be the deciding factor.