The Lowe FM165 Pro WT 2013 vs Lowe R2070VTC 2005 comparison sits squarely in the category of decisions where specs alone won't tell the whole story — intended use, storage, and long-term ownership costs all factor in.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe FM165 Pro WT 2013 measures 16,4 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 14,4 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe R2070VTC 2005 at 2,0 feet (2005). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe FM165 Pro WT 2013 tips the scales at 125 lbs — 117 lbs more than the Lowe R2070VTC 2005 at 8 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 115 hp, the Lowe R2070VTC 2005 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe FM165 Pro WT 2013's 90-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe R2070VTC 2005 is rated for 8 passengers, while the Lowe FM165 Pro WT 2013 caps at 6. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe R2070VTC 2005 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R2070VTC 2005 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 1 lbs per hp for the Lowe FM165 Pro WT 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lowe R2070VTC 2005 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 8 passengers and at 2,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe FM165 Pro WT 2013 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 6 that costs less to run day-to-day.