Matching a deep vee Lowe FM165 Pro SC 2013 against a modified vee Lowe R1760SC 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.

On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe FM165 Pro SC 2013 at 16,4 ft versus Lowe R1760SC 2010 at 17,5 ft. Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe R1760SC 2010 tips the scales at 876 lbs — 864 lbs less than the Lowe FM165 Pro SC 2013 at 12 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.

Both boats share a closely matched power ceiling — 90 hp for the Lowe FM165 Pro SC 2013 and 75 hp for the Lowe R1760SC 2010. Real-world performance will come down more to which motor is actually bolted on, its load at the time, and whether it's a 4-stroke or 2-stroke setup. Fuel capacity breaks the other way: the Lowe FM165 Pro SC 2013 carries 26 gallons versus 2 gallons in the Lowe R1760SC 2010. On a lake day that's negligible, but for coastal cruising or long reservoir runs the extra range matters.

Both boats are rated for 6 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.

At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe FM165 Pro SC 2013 comes in at 0 lbs per hp versus 12 lbs per hp for the Lowe R1760SC 2010. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.