When two boats share the same hull type — in this case both the Lowe AN160SC 2013 and the Lowe R1655SC 2011 are modified vee designs with aluminum construction — the buying decision usually comes down to a handful of practical questions: how many people are you putting on the water, how far do you trailer, and what does your tow vehicle weigh?
On paper these two are close siblings in the size department — Lowe AN160SC 2013 at 16,0 ft versus Lowe R1655SC 2011 at 16,4 ft. At 711 lbs and 752 lbs respectively, both sit in a similar weight class — either should pair comfortably with most mid-size SUVs and half-ton trucks, though always confirm your specific tow rating with the motor added.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 75 hp, the Lowe R1655SC 2011 has a 25-hp advantage over the Lowe AN160SC 2013's 50-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
Both boats are rated for 5 passengers — a good fit for a family of four or five plus guests. Comfort at capacity is another matter; the longer hull typically means more seat options and better weight distribution.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe R1655SC 2011 comes in at 10 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lowe AN160SC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Performance buyers should lean toward the Lowe R1655SC 2011 and its 75-hp ceiling. If fuel economy and quieter running matter more than top-end speed, the Lowe AN160SC 2013 with its 50-hp rating is the more economical daily driver.