Matching a modified vee Lowe AN160SC 2013 against a flat Lowe L1032 2010 means you're likely deciding between two genuinely different on-water experiences. Hull type shapes everything from ride quality and fuel burn to dock handling and resale trajectory.
Size is the most obvious dividing line here. The Lowe AN160SC 2013 measures 16,0 feet overall (2013), giving it roughly 15,0 additional feet of deck space compared to the Lowe L1032 2010 at 1,0 feet (2010). Weight tells a clearer story for trailering families: the Lowe AN160SC 2013 tips the scales at 711 lbs — 703 lbs more than the Lowe L1032 2010 at 8 lbs. That difference is meaningful if you're working within a half-ton or three-quarter-ton truck's tow rating, especially once you factor in a motor, gear, and fuel.
The power gap is worth calling out. Rated to 50 hp, the Lowe AN160SC 2013 has a 47-hp advantage over the Lowe L1032 2010's 3-hp ceiling — enough to notice on acceleration and at cruising speed, particularly with a full passenger load.
For family outings this is probably the sharpest distinction between the two. The Lowe AN160SC 2013 is rated for 5 passengers, while the Lowe L1032 2010 caps at 2. If you're regularly pulling extended family or a group of friends onto the water, the extra seats on the Lowe AN160SC 2013 could be the deciding factor.
At this size, power-to-weight ratio matters more than outright horsepower. The Lowe L1032 2010 comes in at 3 lbs per hp versus 14 lbs per hp for the Lowe AN160SC 2013. The lower the ratio the more explosive the acceleration — meaningful on a short RIB where bursts of speed, quick planing, and agility in surf or tight waterways define the experience.
Bottom line: Choose the Lowe AN160SC 2013 if your priority is putting more people on the water — it handles 5 passengers and at 16,0 ft it has the deck room to back that rating up comfortably. The Lowe L1032 2010 is the smarter pick if you want a lighter, easier-to-trailer boat rated for 2 that costs less to run day-to-day.